Select language:

Invented in Russia: Our Contributions to Scientific and Technological Progress

 /  / Russkiy Mir Foundation / Publications / Invented in Russia: Our Contributions to Scientific and Technological Progress

Invented in Russia: Our Contributions to Scientific and Technological Progress

21.11.2017

Svetlana Smetanina

The icebreaker, backpack parachute, tramcar, and foam fire extinguisher—all of these things have long belonged to the list of human achievements. Most people don’t know that they owe their existence to Russian inventors. At the turn of the twentieth century, Russia had one of the strongest schools of inventors in the world, although in many ways it developed in spite of circumstances. We discussed this topic with Tim Skorenko, the author of the book Invented in Russia and editor-in-chief of the Popular Mechanics website.


Where did you get the idea to write this book and how did you prepare for it? In preparing this book, you used something like four thousand documents…

Of course, I didnt read four thousand books in order to write oneI just made use of a large quantity of sources. How did the book come about? You can find a huge number of various materials and lists titled “Conceived in Russia.” And in 99% of cases very strange things are written there. Recently I came across the assertion that the electric car was invented in Russia. Of course not. Meanwhile, a great number of actual Russian inventions arent mentioned because its difficult to talk about them. Its simpler to say we invented the bicycle (untrue) than to dig a little deeper and write that we invented, say, the turbodrill. But then you need to go and explain what a turbodrill is, while a bicycle doesnt need any explanation. In general, these lists always irritated me. But I dont like to waste my time arguing on the Internet, so I went and wrote this book.

Tim Skorenkos book Invented in Russia. [Photo: maxpark.com]


Your book is subtitled The history of Russian inventive thought from Peter I to Nikolai II. Why did you choose this particular historical period?

This is the first part. There will also be a second. It was just logically convenient to break up the period when a Russian school of invention existed into two more or less equally valuable segments. This book tells the story of the pre-Petrine period as well. But there were spontaneous inventions then, often anonymous. Heres an example for you: Russian history doesnt record the name of a single 16th-century architect. There was always someone who commissioned a certain workman to do it. We dont know who exactly did itnothing is preserved in the documents. The first known Russian architect was Fyodor Kon. His name has been preserved only because he was paid for the work and this is recorded in the accounting books for the 16th century. And its understandable why the payment was made. This concerns not just the architecture but everything else involved.

The most significant story of pre-Petrine times was probably the Russian koch, a traditional northern vessel that had an peculiarly formed keel and a prow cut at a specific angle. And if it got caught in an ice floe, they simply thrust the ship out onto the surface. The koch was the inspiration for the icebreaker in the XIX century.

In the British colonies, now the USA, the first patent for invention was awarded in 1641. In Russia the first one was awarded in the 1740s. And the first document about authorship rights didnt appear until 1812. A law corresponding to modernity appeared even laterin 1896. (An analogous law was introduced in England during the rule of Anna at the beginning of the 18th century). Naturally, in the complete absence of any intellectual property rights could only occur spontaneously. Someone thought up something, and something was disseminated somewhere.

The most significant story of pre-Petrine times was probably the Russian koch, a traditional northern vessel that had an peculiarly formed keel and a prow cut at a specific angle. And if it got caught in an ice floe, they simply thrust the ship out onto the surface. The koch was the inspiration for the icebreaker in the XIX century. The coach allowed people to transverse not only naval routes but also solid land, where the vessel was dragged along.

Koch[Photo: graphage.ru]


The koch was the dominant vessel of the Russian North up until Peters time. Peter tried to ban the construction of non-European vessels. But everyone ignored his injunction.

The first Russian inventor whose name is known clearly from documents appeared during the reign of Peter. This is Andrei Nartov, who invented, among other things, the supported engine lathe (he also developed a number of lathes for various purposes). Ordinary lathes existed before Nartov. But the support fixes the instrument in place. Until then, the workpiece would hang, and the operator would hold the instrument in his hands, which was terribly awkward and didnt allow for any precision.

Nartov came from a family of Mucovites. He enrolled in the Moscow School of Mathematical and Navigational Sciences, which was located in the Sukharev Tower (this was the first higher institute of technical education in Russia, and it also appeared under Peter). But then Peter transferred Nartov to Petersburg and made him his personal workman, that is, practically his minister of industry, though industry at the time was, of course, in bad shape.

Andrei Nartov developed a significant number of lathes. He also wrote a book called Theatrum Machinarium in which he describes the structure of 36 lathes in detail. Unfortunately, he wrote it after Peters death, when this was not useful hardly to anybody. Of course, he himself was in demand. As still the best workman in Russia, he, for instance, raised the Moscow Mint. In Petersburg, he ran the Academy of Sciences for a period of timeand was the only Russian there until Lomonosov, as the rest were all Germans. But his book still wasnt published. The manuscript was found by chance in our own time.

[Nartovs engine lathe. Photo: maketburg.ru]


Nartovs first lathe is, incidentally, preserved in Paris, at the Museum of Arts and Trades. This is because Nartov also studied in FrancePeter sent him to Europe to domesticize their technology. He brought his first lathe with him and left it there. The President of the French Academy of Sciences invited him to stay, but Nartov preferred to return to Russia.

The most famous Russian inventor is still Kulibin

Kulibin was a totally ingenious person with a tragic fate. Ninety percent of his inventions are some totally clownish times for entertaining the court of Catherine the Great, such as fireworks or a bicycle for the Empress. But his serious inventions remain completely unnoticed. In particular, he is the creator of the first simple span bridge across the Neva River. In his time, there was no study of strength materialshis calculations were verified many years later, and it turns out that he didnt err in a single number, though he was flying by the seat of his pants. Only a model was made during Kulibins lifetime, while the actual bridge over the Neva appeared half-a-century after his death.

At the same time, he didnt have a technological education. Kulibin was born in Nizhny Novgorod, his father was a merchant, but he studied clock making. His first well-known work was the Peacock clock that is held at the Hermitage as a gift to Catherine the Great.

Kulibins project for a single-arch bridge across the Neva. [Photo: rusmir.media]


The only invention that could bring him any kind of actual income was a system of projectors with reflective mirrors that he had constructedit was very progressive for its time. But there was no financing earmarked for it. Kulibin himself converted the projectors into lamps for cabs and started making them to order. But since there existed no intellectual property rights, lots of other people started making these lamps.

Did the situation with inventions change after 1812?

From 1812 through 1896 approximately forty invention patents were awarded each year. Meanwhile, the United States awarded 20-30 thousand a year. This wasnt a brainpower problem. In reality, we thought up a great number of things. This is solely a problem with a legislature that was against all kinds of novelty.

In 1812 the Copyrights Proclamation was ratified. This was a major breakthrough, and the number of inventions increased. But this did little to improve the fates of the inventors themselves. Take for instance the tragic story of the lieutenant of the Hussars Zagriazhsky. In the 1830s he thought up caterpillar treadhe was the first person in the world to invent this concept. And he received a patent for it from the tsar after gathering an unaffordable sum of money from his friendsI believe it was 10,000 rubles. And three years later he lost the patent on the basis of his supposed failure to realize it. And he simply didnt have any money for it because no one was interested.
From 1812 through 1896 approximately forty invention patents were awarded each year. Meanwhile, the United States awarded 20-30 thousand a year. This wasnt a brainpower problem. In reality, we thought up a great number of things. This is solely a problem with a legislature that was against all kinds of novelty. There was a strong school of inventors in Russia, talented inventors, but all that they managed to accomplish was oftentimes done in spite of the legislature, rather than with its support..

And as for the Russian school of inventors, when did it really take off?

The school as such took form in the second half of the 19thcentury. Schools generally take shape under a simple set of conditions: first, there shouldnt be any socio-political changes. Therefore, the 1917 revolution was a setback, and 1991 was another setback. Secondly, there ought to be effective intellectual property rights. And thirdly, there should be continuity in the form of institutions of higher education and teachers. All of this appeared in Russia quite late. And nonetheless, a strong school of inventors formed in Russia. As an example, we have always had strong record in electrical engineering, weapons manufacturing, and shipbuilding. In the late 19thcentury, the Russian school of inventors stood among the top five most developed in the world. We invented and introduced things that played a very great technological role in the world.

Tim Skorenko

You have already mentioned the invention of the icebreaker. Tell us more about that.

The icebreaker was created in 1864 thanks to Mikhail Britnev, an owner of factories, newspapers, and steamers, so to speak, a very rich industrialist. One of his several enterprises was the shipping line KronstadtOranienbaum. And so that he could beat his rivals, he was looking for an opportunity to prolong the shipping period. Icebreakers existed at the time, but they used weights: you would toss a weight out onto the ice from a special mast, and this allowed the vessel to get moving. But this type of motion was very slow, literally, meters an hour.

Meanwhile, Britnev took the Russiankochas his model and cut the bow of the steam boatPilotat a particular angle. As a result, the boat could run up onto the ice, which would be crushed under its weightthis is how icebreakers work today. This allowed them to prolong their navigation period by three weeks in the spring and fall. Britnev appealed to the government for support, but he received the traditional response that his invention wasnt needed. (The story was somewhat more complicated, but I wont go into detail, as you can read about it in my book.) Then, Britnev received patents for his invention in Europe and sold his construction to Holland and Germany right away. And the second icebreaker in the world appeared in Germany, once more under Britnevs patent. He built another five icebreakers on his own money.

[Pilot, the first icebreaker. Photo: wikimedia.org]


Under Russian conditions, the successful inventors were the ones who also had remarkable talent as businessmen.
And then theres the much less successful story of Fyodor Pirotsky, the inventor of the tramcar. He was a simple soldier and spent practically all of his money on buying generators and acquiring from Petersburg the right to refit a horse-drawn wagon into a tramcar and to try it out. For a month the tramcar transported passengers no worse than a horse-drawn tram, and it was allotted an 85-meter route. But in the end all this was liquidated because the horse-drawn trams had a strong lobby, while Pirotsky didnt receive any state support. Siemens invited Pirotsky to Germany to work, but Pirotsky turned him down and ended up dying in poverty. Meanwhile, Germany produced tramcars, and Russia bought them from there several years later.

Under Russian conditions, the successful inventors were the ones who also had remarkable talent as businessmen. Someone like Alexander Loran, for instance, who invented the foam fire extinguisher. He began manufacturing them in Petersburg, and then sold to a larger company. Or for example, Pyotr Prokopovich, who invented the first movable frame hive. At one time he owned the largest apiary in the world, the size of which exceeded to combined size of all apiaries in Europe. It was quite simple: the moveable frame hive allows one to extract honey without killing families of bees. At the time, the world used box hive beekeepingyou would break open the box and the family of bees would die.

The von Siemens electric tramcar. [Photo: siemens.com]


So there were success stories. There were also stories of reverse emigration, so to speak. This is the case of Nikolay Benardos, who invented carbon arc welding. He realized his idea in France and then returned to Russia triumphantly. Or Yablochkov with his candles (a version of the electric arc lampEd.), Lodygin with his bulbs.

A whole chapter of your book is dedicated to disputed inventions: Lodygin and Edison, Mozhaysky and the Wright brothers. Is it really hard to say in these cases who came first?

These arent disputed inventions, but rather collective ones: the light bulb, plane, radio. All the people who were trying to invent them relied on each others work. There is no first and second hereits a whole chain of inventions.

Lets look at the radio. Herz discovered electromagnetic waves but didnt know what to do with them. At his lectures he demonstrated the first transmitter and receiver, but when a student asked him, And what next? Herz responded there wasnt anythingit was just an experiment. Then came Tesla, who was the first to demonstrate the public transmission of a radio signal. Then came Lodge, who created the first transmitter that could transmit meaningful messages. Then Popov, who modified Lodges receiver, perfecting it to the condition of a practically finished radio system. Then came Marconi, who further perfected Popovs receiver and transmitted the first messages. Its a whole Pleiade. If there were no Popov, a link would have been missing, and no one knows what Marconi would have achieved on the basis of Lodges work.

Its the same thing with the light bulb and airplane. The Wright Brothers were the first, but they based their work on a great number of designs that were invented before them. For instance, I dont diminish Mozhayskys geniushis airplane just didnt fly. But Mozhaysky was the first to guess that it wasnt necessary for the airplanes wings to imitate a bird. And this, incidentally, worked against himthis ended up being the reason why the government refused to finance him.

Despite the negative consequences of the October Revolution in 1917 and the subsequent Civil War on the history of Russian invention, one of the heroes of your book actually managed to realize himself most successfully during the Soviet period

There were others as well. Its just that nearly all such stories ended up in the second volume. But yes, hes the only one in this book: Kotelnikov, the inventor of the backpack parachuteone of the few inventors who were helped by the 1917 Revolution. The tsarist authorities received the parachute very coolly. Their most common argument was that pilots would bail from expensive plains at every opportunity, and these would break apart. Kotelnikov darkened every doorstep and succeeded in outfitting active aerial divisions with his parachutes, but when he volunteered for the war himself, he happened one day upon a transport that was carrying his backpack parachutes, which hadnt even made it to the airplanes. That is, they were simply siphoning off money. But during the Soviet period Kotelnikov was in demand. He was successful and developed a great number of models for backpack parachutes. In principle, he invented the entire system whereby one can have a parachute on ones back and open it when needed. Although parachutes themselves had existed since the 17th century, they were very complicated designs.

[Kotelnikovs parachute (authors drawing). Photo: pbs.twimg.com]


The revolution changed everything. If Im not mistaken, the 1896 law on intellectual property remained in effect until 1924. And then there was a period of anonymizationsomeone could invent the laser and go on to spend his whole life working as a simple factory engineer and, at best, end up driving a Volga. This also had its advantages. Because great sums were allotted to high priority inventions, such as space travel or military equipment. Meanwhile, there were no opportunities for those inventors who might come up with a home tape recorder or something else for common home use. Because there was no one to implement these ideas. On the one hand, the Soviet authorities gave a certain jolt, but on the other, they limited everything with a hard ceiling. All the same, inventors made it work in the end. In the 1960s and 70s, a strong school of inventors once again appeared in the USSR. But thats a whole other story.

New publications

Ten Russian regions, including five that will host the World Cup next year, are taking part in the Gastronomical Map of Russia federal project. This means that visitors to these regions will be able to enjoy not only their cultural and natural landmarks, but also culinary samplings made from local products.
Two years of work, 20 hours of interviews, four episodes of the documentary and now yet the issue of The Putin Interviews that acclaimeddirector Oliver Stone presented at the International Book FairNon/fiction19. Filmmaker believes in the importance of conveying the Russian president's views to the Western society, where the situation on matters relating to the freedom of expression reminds him Soviet newspaper Pravda from Soviet times.
In September and October of 2017, a Russian expedition organized by the Miklouho-Maclay Foundation visited the Maclay Coast in Papua New Guinea, which was discovered by the famous explorer who gave the Foundation its name. To learn about this corner of the Earth (practically unknown to Russians) and his encounter with the descendants of the Papuans who received Nicholas Miklouho-Maclay 150 years ago, we spoke with the explorers descendant Nikolai Miklouho-Maclay, Jr.
On 22 November Russias greatest baritone passed away. He worshipped Enrico Caruso, Mario Lanza, and Feodor Chaliapinnames that are etched into the history of vocal artistry. And now one more joins their ranksDmitri Hvorostovsky.
The idea for the Teacher for Russia program originated with two graduates from Saint Petersburg State University, Alena Makovich and Elena Yarmanova after they came across Teach for All, a major international network of nongovernmental social enterprises. Four years have passed since then, and this year the Russian program celebrated its first graduating class.
7 November marked the centennial of the October Revolutionan event that, whatever you think of it, has done much to define the entire twentieth century. And of course, the main figure in these epoch-making events was Vladimir Ilich Lenin. We have attempted to interview the Bolshevik leader so that he might explain how he related to the tasks of revolution, politics, morality, and other questions that are important to us all.
Poland appears frequently in the Russian informational space, but sadly, it appears almost every time for a painful reason. This results in a corresponding tone for discussions in online forums. Of course, even a passing familiarity with these forums will show that a typical Russian, especially a young one, does not have a high level of knowledge about Poland (to say the least). And this is too bad, since Russo-Polish relations are very instructive.